Skip to main content

COMMENTARY: What the hell are we doing, Boston?

Thursday, May 28, 2026
14 min read
MDN Editor
3 shares
COMMENTARY: What the hell are we doing, Boston?

Property taxes up 13%. Firefighter cancer screening axed. Potholes everywhere, addicts on the park benches. Meanwhile, the mayor is busy planning Trans Period Pride, fighting Trump with Manhattan lawyers, and jetting to Nova Scotia for the Christmas tree. Time to get back to basics.

Listen to Article

0:0010:03
Speed:
BOSTON — Forgive me, but somebody at City Hall is going to have to explain — slowly, and with a straight face — what exactly is going on in this city.
Property taxes have been hiked 13% on top of last year's 10.4% — the largest hike Boston has seen in nearly two decades. Electric bills keep climbing. The streets are full of potholes. The parks are full of needles. The cost of living here has gotten steep enough that 180,000 residents have packed up and left Massachusetts since 2020. And yet, somehow, Mayor Wu has grown the city budget by more than a billion dollars since taking office, and still finds Boston short.
Yes, she's cutting things — veterans, firefighter cancer screening, the lines that actually keep the city running. The total budget is still up by a billion. The belt isn't being tightened; the money is being moved. In the middle of all this, Mayor Wu also received a $43,000 raise — comfortably waved through by a city council majority loaded with her own allies. The same council, days earlier, killed a resolution to restore the firefighter cancer screening that the mayor cut. Coincidence is a strong word. So is rubber stamp.
This week, Boston's nearly $1 million Office of LGBTQIA2S+ Advancement co-sponsored a "Trans Period Pride" event at the Boston Public Library — free period underwear handed out at the door, a "consciousness-raising discussion on menstrual equity and the experiences of trans menstruators" on the agenda. The same library is running 19 drag queen story hours for children in June alone. The same city was, last month, writing $500 yoga and massage vouchers for "LGBTQ+ migrants" — until Mass Daily News exposed the whole thing and Wu was forced to walk it back.
This is also the administration that, in the same fiscal year, proposed cutting Veterans Services by 14% — and is reportedly preparing to walk the cut back after weeks of public backlash, per councilor Erin Murphy, who said she was "hearing encouraging news" the administration would fully restore the line. The same budget quietly refused to restore $1.4 million in federal funding for firefighter cancer screening, money that had paid for hundreds of skin-cancer screenings and caught two potential melanomas in its most recent year. A late council resolution to restore the firefighter money was killed when one of Wu's own councilors objected on the spot. Veterans are reportedly getting their funding back — only after public outcry and council pressure. Firefighters are not.
Mayor Michelle Wu with members of a Boston VFW post
Mayor Michelle Wu with members of a Boston VFW post. Her FY27 budget proposed a 14% cut to the Office of Veterans' Services. Councilor Erin Murphy says the administration is now preparing to fully restore the line after weeks of public outcry.
The math here is not difficult. With a billion dollars more to play with than when she took office, Mayor Wu has stood up a constellation of new identity offices, each with its own staff, mission statement, and six-figure director. The Office of LGBTQ+ Advancement alone costs taxpayers nearly a million dollars a year. The city's DEI line item has ballooned from $900,000 in her first year to $22 million today. Until recently, the director of Boston's economic strategy was a $184,000-a-year history major hired to manage the worst commercial-real-estate collapse in living memory — all while embroiled in scandal. He has, thankfully, since been shown the door. The deputy director of the LGBTQ+ office was arrested for slamming a woman into a wall and kept on the city payroll for months — a story Mass Daily News broke on its very first day of publication. When you create the offices, the offices have to be fed. The basics get the leftovers.
To be perfectly clear, none of this is an argument against the LGBTQ community, or Pride Month, or any one of the city's community programs. If Boston wishes to hold a Pride parade, by all means, hold the parade. If grown adults wish to gather at the library and discuss menstrual equity, that is their right — it remains, just about, a free country. The question is not whether any of these things ought to exist. The question is whether a city facing double-digit tax hikes, a fleeing population, and a commercial revenue base in freefall ought to be the entity underwriting them while firefighters lose their cancer screenings and the basics rot.

The basics, in case anyone has forgotten

There are addicts shooting up on park benches in this city, and children walk past them on the way home from school. Last fall, Mayor Wu's own health chief admitted to a stunned audience that Boston is handing out roughly 80,000 needles a month — at taxpayer expense, with no requirement those needles ever come back. They end up inside Back Bay apartment buildings, on the floor of the public library, in front of someone's child — anywhere, in other words, except a treatment program.
Man slumped on the curb in the South End
Slumped on the curb just steps from million-dollar South End homes — the everyday reality of Boston's so-called "safest major city in America." (Credit: southendsos / Instagram)
A man was found smoking crack, naked, on a Beacon Hill family's couch earlier this month after walking in through their front door. Residents in once-quiet neighborhoods have started documenting the chaos themselves, having long ago given up on the city doing it for them.

MASSDAILYNEWS

STAY UPDATED

Get Mass Daily News delivered to your inbox

The mayor will tell you, often, with a chart, that Boston is the safest major city in America. The chart is not the city. A statistic is not a sidewalk. There are residents in this city — wives walking to their cars at seven in the morning, parents pushing strollers past the encampments, workers waiting for the bus before sunrise — who do not feel safe, and would tell you so, and whose felt experience matters at least as much as the homicide-per-capita line on the press-release slide.
One ought not, in 2026, accept a society in which people are permitted to shoot up on a park bench. We are better than that. These are sick people who need help — and "help" is not handing out a fresh syringe and walking away. Help is treatment, sometimes against the addict's wishes, the way every functioning society has handled public-health crises since long before any of us were born. It is jail when jail is what breaks the cycle, and a bed and a counselor when treatment is what works. It is a city willing to say no — to the open-air encampments, to the endless tolerance of public drug use, to the comfortable fiction that compassion can look like abandonment with a clean needle.

A mayor with a national profile and a city full of potholes

One does begin to suspect that the mayor's primary constituency is not, in fact, the people of Boston. Mayor Wu has spent the past year jetting to Munich for international conferences, giving speeches at Harvard, courting the national press, and signing Boston up for European mayoral pacts on pro-refugee policy. Last fall, she even flew to Nova Scotia to personally pick up the city's annual Christmas tree — a photo-op that ballooned into a roughly $13,000 taxpayer spectacle complete with personal photographer, police escort, and a waterfront hotel for her and her family.
She is, by all accounts, a star of the progressive firmament — invited to the panels, profiled in the magazines, named in every "ones to watch" feature for the next round of higher office. Cities have ambitious mayors, and that is fine. But residents are being asked to buckle down, save, absorb a 13% property-tax hike, and trust the city when it says the bill is simply due — while the mayor cuts ribbons abroad and prices a freshly-cut Canadian spruce at thirteen grand. The math eventually catches up with everyone.

The Trump fight is not free

Mayor Wu's posture toward the federal government comes with a price tag, and the people paying it are not the mayor. Boston has already lost roughly $355 million in federal funding, with another $280 million on the chopping block, as the city tangles with the Trump administration over its sanctuary stance. The mayor has been hiring the kind of DC and Manhattan lawyers who do not, as a rule, bill at Boston rates.
I get the politics. I get that ICE should not be raiding churches and schools, and that a city has a legitimate interest in protecting families simply trying to get to work. But Mayor Wu should not be proud, in 2026, that her sanctuary stand has at various times sheltered a convicted murderer and kidnapper and a man charged with possession of child sexual abuse material and indecent assault on a child until federal agents hauled them out themselves. That is not sticking it to Donald Trump. That is sticking it to the residents who have to live next door.
This is supposed to be a balancing act. Work with the federal government on identifying and removing the worst offenders, and ICE doesn't have to sweep through neighborhoods grabbing the grandmother who got caught up in something she never fully understood. Refuse to cooperate on principle — the way Boston has — and you get the raids, the lawsuits, the lawyer bills, and the lost $355 million. There is a choice to be made here, and City Hall has been making the wrong one.

Blue, but the right kind of blue

Nobody is asking Boston to become Florida or Texas. Boston is never going to be that, and that is fine. The city can stay blue. The question is what kind of blue.
There was once a blue city of working people — the city of John F. Kennedy, of Tip O'Neill, of Ray Flynn — that believed in unions, in cops on the corner, in schools that worked, in a mayor who showed up to ribbon-cuttings at the new firehouse and not the new pronoun consultancy. That blue city has been quietly replaced by a different kind of blue: a city of $920,702 LGBTQIA2S+ offices and $13,000 Canadian Christmas trees, of out-of-state lawyers and elaborate acronyms, of menstrual-equity discussions and federal-funding lawsuits, of priorities so far removed from the everyday concerns of the people paying for it that one wonders whether City Hall has visited those people lately. Kennedy would turn over in his grave.

This is what progressive government actually looks like

The people of Boston were told that all of this — the expansion of City Hall, the multiplication of departments, the rebranding and the consultants and the new offices with the elaborate acronyms — would somehow translate into more, and better, basic services. That a bigger government would be a government that worked harder for them. None of that has happened. The city has more line items than ever, more directors than ever, more press releases than ever, and less to show for it in clean streets, safe parks, working schools, and addicts off the benches.
Boston residents have every right to be mad about that. They were promised a government that would work for them. They got one that has worked, primarily, for its own staffing chart and the mayor's personal brand. The 2020-vintage progressive consensus has had its run, and the run is over. People are done with it.
So here is the message to City Hall. Have your parade. Hold your programming. Be the inclusive city you wish to be. But do the actual job first — fill the potholes, pick up the needles, get the addicts into treatment, keep the streets safe, restore the cancer screening for the firefighters, work with the federal government on the criminals who genuinely need to go — and before the next round of identity programming is announced, perhaps somebody at the budget desk might check whether the city can still afford the lights.
Time to get back to basics.

If you want to know how the rest of Boston feels about it, look no further

Thirty-seven thousand people, opening day, no rehearsal needed.

Have a tip? Email us at [email protected]

Loading Comments

COMMENTARY: What the hell are we doing, Boston? - Mass Daily News