
The activists behind the vote
- Disparate impact. Cambridge's sensors were concentrated in majority-minority neighborhoods. Activists argued that increased police response in those neighborhoods amounted to over-policing regardless of what triggered the response.
- False alarms. Boston Police records analyzed by the ACLU of Massachusetts found nearly 70% of ShotSpotter alerts led to dead ends. Activists said each false alert still counted as a police intrusion into Black and brown communities.
- Federal immigration risk. Some Cambridge councilors and activists argued gunshot-detection response could indirectly aid a federal government "whose immigration agenda the city doesn't support" — meaning any police encounter risked flagging undocumented residents to ICE.
MASSDAILYNEWS
STAY UPDATED
Get Mass Daily News delivered to your inbox
ADVERTISEMENT · Interested in advertising?
ADVERTISEMENT · Interested in advertising?
Union: this is on the Council

Xavier Bautista

ADVERTISEMENT · Interested in advertising?
ADVERTISEMENT · Interested in advertising?

Loading Comments